At first glance, ‘Consequences of Conviction’ might suggest a straightforward cause-and-effect scenario: steadfast beliefs lead to tangible results, both positive and negative. Conversely, hardships or isolation might be, a price paid for the unwavering stance. The phrase also leaves open the question of what constitutes conviction. Is it merely a matter of holding strong to one’s beliefs, or does it involve a more profound commitment to principles that shape every action and decision? And how do these convictions interact with the broader fabric of society, influencing and being influenced in turn?
